| |
| E. Save Taxes
by Shifting or Deferring Income |
|
|
- Shifting Income to Your Child -
Children under the age of 18 in 2007 (under the age
of 19 and full-time students under the age of 24 beginning
in 2008) are subject to the so-called kiddie tax.
This was enacted by Congress to restrict taxpayers
from shifting large amounts of income to their children
by taxing the child at the parent’s marginal
tax rate. However, for children without earnings from
working, there is no kiddie tax on the first $850
of investment income, and the next $850 is taxed at
10%. Once the child reaches age 14, all of their income
is taxed at their own marginal rate. Once the child’s
income reaches the point where it would be taxed at
the parent’s rate, additional investments can
be made through tax-deferred investment vehicles.
To avoid the negative effects of the Kiddie Tax, it
has been a popular higher-education funding tax strategy
for parents to transfer appreciated capital assets,
such as stock, to a child to be sold after the child
was out from under the Kiddie Tax rules at the age
of 18. This strategy looked to be especially attractive
for years 2008 through 2010 when the tax rate for
long-term capital gains (and qualified dividends)
drops to zero for taxpayers in the 15% or lower marginal
rate. Parents of unmarried children age 18 to 23 who
are full-time students expected that the children
would also be able to enjoy the lower capital gains
rates. However, Congress has essentially closed this
loophole by subjecting children through age 18 and
full-time students age 19 to 23 to the Kiddie Tax
rules beginning in 2008. Another change to the rules
may prevent some of these older children from falling
into the Kiddie Tax trap; if the child’s earned
income exceeds one-half of the child’s support,
the Kiddie Tax rules won’t apply.
Because of these impending changes, a parent may want
to reconsider any planned transfers of income-generating
stocks, bonds, and other investments to children age
18, or those age 19-23 who are full-time students.
However, placing or moving a child's funds into tax
deferred or tax free investments such as U.S. Savings
Bonds, tax-deferred annuities, municipal bonds, growth
stocks, etc. that produce little or no current taxable
income, can help avoid the Kiddie Tax, at least in
the years until the investments need to be sold or
redeemed to pay for the education expenses.
- Investing in U.S. Savings Bonds
- Interest income from U.S. Savings Bonds may be deferred
until the bonds are cashed in. Thus, one can defer
income for the life of the bonds.
- Investing in Deferred Annuities
- Because the interest earned on a deferred annuity
is tax-deferred, your earnings are not taxed until
withdrawn. This also allows the investment to compound
faster.
- Employing Your Child - Payments
that you make to your child under the age of 18, who
works for you in your trade or business that is a
sole proprietorship or partnership in which each partner
is a parent of the child, are not subject to Social
Security and Medicare taxes. As long as the pay is
reasonable for the necessary services to the business
provided by the child, you can deduct that pay as
a business expense. Assuming the child has no other
income, he or she will not have any tax on the first
$5,350 of wages from you in 2007. Your child may also
make deductible contributions to an IRA of the lesser
of earned income or $4,000. These contributions can
offset income, so your child could receive $9,350
in gross income by combining the IRA deduction with
the standard deduction and pay no tax.
- IRA Contributions - For 2007,
an individual may contribute the lesser of his or
her compensation or $4,000 to their IRA accounts.
The spouse can do the same even if he or she does
not work, provided the joint compensation is at least
$8,000 for the year. For individuals age 50 and over,
the annual limit is increased by $1,000. Contributions
to a Traditional IRA cannot be made once the taxpayer
reaches age 70-1/2. For purposes of determining IRA
deduction limits, individuals who receive taxable
alimony and separate maintenance payments may treat
the alimony as compensation even if it is the only
income they have. This allows alimony recipients to
save for their retirement by making either Traditional
or Roth IRA contributions. Traditional IRA contributions
are deductible if the taxpayer and spouse (if married)
do not actively participate in another qualified retirement
plan or if their AGI is below income phase-out levels.
For married taxpayers where one spouse is an active
participant in a qualified plan and the other is not,
the IRA deduction is phased out when AGI is between
$150,000 and $160,000 for the one who is not an active
participant.
| 2007
TRADITIONAL IRA PHASE OUT AGI |
| Phase
Out |
Single
&
Head of Household |
Joint*
&
Surviving Spouse |
Married
Separate |
| Threshold |
$52,000 |
$83,000 |
$0 |
| Complete |
$62,000 |
$103,000 |
$10,000 |
*When both spouses are active participants
in qualified plans.
If you cannot deduct your IRA contribution or you
simply wish to generate tax-free retirement funds,
you can contribute to a Roth IRA instead of the Traditional
IRA, provided the owner’s AGI is below the phase-out
levels shown in the table below. Roth IRA distributions
are tax-free after a five-year waiting period and
the owner has reached age 59-1/2 or becomes disabled.
| ROTH
IRA PHASE OUT AGI |
| Phase
Out |
Single
&
Head of Household |
Joint
&
Surviving Spouse |
Married
Separate |
| Threshold |
$ 99,000 |
$156,000 |
$0 |
| Complete |
$114,000
|
$166,000 |
$10,000 |
An individual can convert all or any portion of his
or her Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, provided their
AGI does not exceed $100,000 in the year of conversion.
Since income tax must be paid on the conversion amount,
it makes sense to convert if there are many years
to go before the individual plans to withdraw the
funds. This allows the IRA to accumulate tax-free
earnings and appreciation. If an individual has one
or more IRA accounts invested in stocks or mutual
funds that have declined in value, this might be an
opportune time to convert it to a Roth IRA. Another
reason to convert to a Roth IRA is to pass on money
to your heirs. Unlike a Regular IRA, there are no
mandatory withdrawals for the Roth IRA owner, and
the heirs will not be liable for income taxes when
the Roth IRA is distributed to them.
Beginning in 2010, new legislation: (1) Eliminates
the $100,000 modified AGI limit on conversions of
traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs, and (2)Permits married
taxpayers filing a separate return to convert amounts
in a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA. Under prior
law, married taxpayers who filed separate returns
were restricted from making conversions.
- Roth 2010 Rollover Strategies
- Looking ahead, there are some interesting strategies
a taxpayer can employ to convert nondeductible traditional
IRA contributions to a Roth IRA, thereby funding the
more favorable Roth IRA. Taxpayers who have employer
plans and are restricted from making deductible traditional
IRA contributions because of income level can make
nondeductible traditional IRA contributions in the
tax years leading up to 2010 and then convert those
nondeductible traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs with virtually
no tax since they were nondeductible. Only the earnings
would be taxable. Taxpayers who are prohibited from
making Roth IRA contributions because their income
exceeds the limit may also benefit from this strategy.
Using the same strategy, even a taxpayer who can make
a deductible contribution can elect to make it nondeductible,
providing the same result as above.
- Self-Employed Retirement Plans
- The maximum deduction for a self-employed individual’s
contribution on their own behalf to a profit-sharing
or SEP plan for 2007 is the lesser of 20% of net self-employment
earnings (after the deduction for one-half of self-employment
taxes) or $45,000. In addition, a self-employed individual
who is age 50 or older can make an additional catch-up
contribution of $5,000 for 2007. Self-employed individuals
are also allowed a 401(k)-style elective deferral
of the lesser of the annual maximum ($15,000 in 2007)
or the net profit from the self-employed business
less the profit-sharing or SEP contribution.

|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|